<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scott Logic &#187; Validation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottlogic.co.uk/blog/category/validation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottlogic.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Technical Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:49:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>BindingGroups for Total View Validation</title>
		<link>http://www.scottlogic.co.uk/blog/colin/2009/01/bindinggroups-for-total-view-validation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottlogic.co.uk/blog/colin/2009/01/bindinggroups-for-total-view-validation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Eberhardt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Codeproject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Validation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WPF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottlogic.co.uk/blog/colin/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Over the weekend Sacha published a new article on codeproject, Total View Validation (does Sacha ever sleep?).  This article addresses some of the perceived problems with the WPF binding framework, firstly, that the standard solution of using the ValidatesOnDataErrors property forces you to place validation logic into your bound business objects, and secondly, that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottlogic.co.uk/blog/colin/2009/01/bindinggroups-for-total-view-validation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using BindingGroups for greater control over input validation</title>
		<link>http://www.scottlogic.co.uk/blog/colin/2008/11/using-bindinggroups-for-greater-control-over-input-validation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottlogic.co.uk/blog/colin/2008/11/using-bindinggroups-for-greater-control-over-input-validation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Eberhardt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Validation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WPF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpfadventures.wordpress.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In a recent post on his blog Josh Smith described a technique for providing more meaningful error messages when the type conversion process fails within the binding framework. Consider the following problem; you bind an integer property of your object (Age for example) to a TextBox within your user interface. If the user enters a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottlogic.co.uk/blog/colin/2008/11/using-bindinggroups-for-greater-control-over-input-validation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
